The Emperor's New Financial Clothes

Everton's 10-point deduction for breaching FFP was not justice; it was theatre. The Premier League's profit and sustainability rules are a smoke-and-mirrors operation, designed to give the illusion of competitive balance while entrenching the status quo.

The Historical Precedent: Punishing the Ambitious

Everton join a long line of clubs — from Portsmouth to Derby County — who were penalised for trying to break the cartel. Meanwhile, Manchester City, with 115 charges hanging over them, continue to spend, win, and count their Abu Dhabi millions. It is not about fairness; it is about selective enforcement.

The system rewards clubs with massive matchday revenues — Old Trafford's 74,000 seats generate more than Goodison Park's 40,000 could dream of. But that is not a reflection of good financial governance; it is a structural advantage baked into the rulebook.

The Argument: FFP Is a Cartel Protection Racket

FFP does not prevent financial mismanagement; it prevents challengers. Consider three specific points:

  • Clubs with the largest stadiums and commercial revenue — like Manchester United and Arsenal — are virtually immune to FFP breaches because their income naturally absorbs losses.
  • Owner investment is capped, so the only way to compete is to sell assets — but selling academy graduates like Chelsea's regime does is not sustainable, it is a regulatory loophole.
  • The rules ignore debt if it is structured as owner loans (the Glazers' £500m) but count spending on youth infrastructure as an expense — deterring long-term investment.

This is not prudent regulation; it is the cartel pulling up the drawbridge.

The Counter-Argument: 'Rules Are Rules'

Defenders of FFP argue that clubs must live within their means, that overspending leads to insolvency, and that the rules protect the league's integrity. But this ignores a simple truth: the Premier League approved Everton's stadium spending plan, then punished them for the losses that same spending caused. And while the Toffees are docked points, Chelsea's £1bn spend under a new owner is exempted via creative accounting — amortisation over eight years, selling hotel to itself.

The rules are not neutral; they are a weapon wielded against those who dare to challenge the established order. The real financial doping is the use by the rich of their structural advantages.

Verdict: The Next Club to Be Sanctioned

Everton will not be the last. By 2026, Brentford or Brighton — clubs who relied on selling players to balance books but now face a depressed transfer market — will be the next sacrificial lambs. The Premier League will enforce the rules not to ensure fairness, but to remind every club that the ceiling is set by the big six. That is the only truth FFP has ever told.

Filed under: Opinion | LA Premier League Home