VAR Has Quietly Bought Itself More Time Than It Deserves

Forget the offside lines and the handball rules—the Premier League's most corrosive secret is the invisible hand that stretches every match beyond its natural death. Stoppage time, once the plaything of a single referee's whimsy, is now a tool of coercion, and VAR is the beneficiary.

From Fergie Time to the Era of Manufactured Extensions

When football adopted digital stoppage time at the 2022 World Cup, the sport celebrated its new, ruthlessly precise approach. In England, the Premier League followed suit, with referees instructed to add every second lost to goal celebrations, substitutions, and the game's eternal delays. The result wasn't fairness—it was a promotional gift to broadcasters and a lifeline for the desperate.

Look at the evidence: average match time has crept past 101 minutes, up from 97 in 2019. That's an extra four minutes of advertising, four minutes of injury-risk exposure, and four minutes for a trailing side to manufacture a reprieve. The nadir came on the opening weekend of 2025–26, when Nottingham Forest's 2–2 draw at Anfield saw the fourth official signal nine minutes of added time. Nine. For a game that had one serious injury delay and a handful of substitutions.

The Hidden Tax: How VAR's Checks Inflate the Clock

Consider the average video review: the referee jogs to the monitor, the broadcast cuts to a different angle each time, the crowd holds its breath. Each check eats 90 seconds. Each check is discretionary, subject to the PGMOL's ever-evolving brief. Unsurprisingly, the data now shows that matches with a VAR on-field review average 45 seconds more added time than matches without.

  • Everton's 91st-minute equaliser at Bournemouth last month arrived after a six-minute VAR delay for a dubious penalty shout.
  • Spurs' defeat to Newcastle in January featured a 14-minute first half—the longest in Premier League history—thanks to a head injury assessment and two offside checks.
  • The average added time for matches featuring a red card has skyrocketed to 11 minutes, up from 7 in the pre-VAR era.

This isn't about accuracy—it's about control. By urging referees to stretch matches, PGMOL ensures that every controversy gets its full, dramatic resolution.

But Isn't More Football a Good Thing? The Case for Precision—and Its Collapse

You'll hear from the apologists: "Football must rid itself of time-wasting. The spectacles are better when the ball is actually in play." That's the official line, and it has merit—nobody misses the goalkeeper who reads a novel before a goal kick.

But the policy is applied with grotesque inconsistency. Arsenal's 1–0 win at Brentford in September saw six minutes added despite zero stoppages of any significance. Manchester City's title run last season benefited from a 98th-minute equaliser against Aston Villa, awarded after a phantom VAR check for a foul that never happened. The rules are now clear to everyone: every match is a rolling coin flip where the referee's stopwatch—not the action—determines the outcome.

The Verdict: By 2027, a Match Will Stretch Past 120 Minutes—and the FA Will Do Nothing

Here is my falsifiable prediction: within two seasons, a Premier League fixture will reach the 120th minute without extra time, as VAR's checks pile atop a mountain of stoppage. And when that happens, the league's response will be a half-hearted memo about "effective playing time," followed by yet another tweak to the guidelines. The rot isn't the technology—it's the cowardice of those who let it define the sport. If you see a referee glance at his watch after a 45th-minute VAR review, know that you're watching the game being stolen, one second at a time.

Filed under: Opinion | LA Premier League Home