VAR has turned referees into powerless middle managers

The most damning indictment of modern refereeing isn't a wrong offside call. It's that Michael Oliver, arguably the best referee of his generation, now spends his Saturdays hoping a colleague in a booth 200 miles away doesn't embarrass him. That's not authority. That's middle management.

The hollowing-out of the man in black

Compare this to the 1990s. A referee like David Elleray commanded the pitch. He made a decision; it stood. Yes, he made mistakes—Paul Davis breaking Glenn Cockerill's jaw at Highbury in 1988 earned a mere booking, a decision Elleray later admitted was wrong. But Elleray answered to no one but his own conscience and the FA's disciplinary panel.

Today's referee is a node in a network. He signals for a review, waits for a Stockley Park verdict, and then performs the theatre of jogging to a monitor. The 2024-25 season saw 112 VAR overturns in the Premier League—a record. Yet the average time for a check crept past 90 seconds, and the number of 'clear and obvious' errors identified by the independent panel actually rose. More intervention, less accuracy. That's not a technology problem. It's a governance problem.

The cowardice is institutional, not individual

Here's the case. PGMOL has created a culture where overturning a colleague's decision is treated as a personal betrayal, not a professional duty. Referees are graded on 'match control' and 'consistency', not on getting the call right.

  • In the 2023-24 season, PGMOL admitted that the failure to overturn Luis Diaz's wrongly disallowed goal at Tottenham was due to a 'significant human error'—but the audio revealed the VAR team was more concerned with confirming the on-field decision than correcting it.
  • Last month, Anthony Taylor waved away a clear foul in the box at the Etihad. The VAR, Craig Pawson, spent 40 seconds checking the monitor before sticking with the on-field call. The independent panel later voted 4-1 that it was a penalty. Pawson kept his role the following week.
  • PGMOL's 'match officials: mic'd up' programme, launched in 2023, was meant to restore trust. Instead, it has become a masterclass in passive-aggressive non-apologies—'I understand why you're frustrated, but...'

Referees aren't cowards by nature. They're rational actors in a system that punishes the courage to say 'I got it wrong'. The result is a generation of officials who defer, deflect, and protect each other rather than the Laws of the Game.

But surely the technology is the problem?

The steel-man argument goes: VAR's flaws are inherent to the technology—frame-rate ambiguity, subjective interpretations of 'clear and obvious', the impossibility of drawing a line that satisfies everyone. Scrap VAR, and referees regain their authority.

That's seductive nonsense. Scrapping VAR would simply return us to the pre-2019 era of howlers that everyone could see but no one could correct. The genie is out of the bottle. The real issue is that PGMOL has used VAR as a shield to avoid accountability, not a tool to improve accuracy.

Consider the data: since VAR's introduction, the number of penalties awarded per season has fluctuated wildly—from 103 in 2019-20 to 80 in 2022-23, then back to 95 last season. If VAR were delivering consistency, we'd see convergence. Instead, we see referees second-guessing themselves depending on the week, the crowd, and the perceived 'narrative'. That's not technology. That's fear.

The verdict: PGMOL will double down, then face a revolt

Here's a specific, falsifiable prediction: before the end of the 2025-26 season, at least three Premier League clubs will publicly call for Howard Webb's resignation, and PGMOL will respond by announcing a 'root-and-branch review' that changes nothing. The referees' union will resist any proposal to publish real-time audio—not because it's technically difficult, but because it would expose the culture of deference. And the VAR farce will continue, not because the technology is flawed, but because the men operating it are terrified of the men they're meant to correct.

Filed under: Opinion | LA Premier League Home