The real VAR crisis is not technology—it is our cowardice

The latest refereeing scandal is not a failure of VAR. It is a failure of everyone who demanded it. We wanted perfect justice, and we got a machine that cannot deliver it. The Premier League’s soul was not sold for forensic handballs. It was sold for the illusion of certainty.

How we got here: the impossible quest for zero errors

In the 2018-19 season, the Premier League introduced VAR with a promise: to overturn ‘clear and obvious errors’. Within months, that phrase became a punchline. The technology was never the problem. The problem was the standard we set. No other sport demands its officials be infallible. Rugby union accepts that TMO decisions are judgment calls. Cricket’s DRS still has ‘umpire’s call’. Football alone decided that a toe offside in a build-up 45 seconds earlier must be punished with robotic precision.

The result? A season like 2023-24, where Wolves, Nottingham Forest, and Liverpool all wrote to PGMOL demanding answers. The average VAR check now takes over 90 seconds, yet the number of controversial decisions has not fallen. It has simply changed shape. We swapped human error for bureaucratic error. The same people who howled at Martin Atkinson’s mistakes now howl at Stuart Attwell’s. The common factor is not the referee. It is us.

The case for embracing fallibility

Refereeing has always been imperfect. From Clive Thomas disallowing a Brazil goal in 1978 to Graham Poll’s three yellow cards in 2006, the game survived. In fact, it thrived. Those moments became folklore, not existential threats. Today, a single wrong offside call triggers a national conversation about the ‘death of football’. That is not a refereeing crisis. That is a cultural crisis.

Consider the evidence:

  • In the 2024-25 season, PGMOL admitted to 12 ‘significant’ errors in the first 20 rounds—roughly one every two matchdays. The actual number of debatable calls was far higher, but that has always been true. The difference is that every single one is now televised, replayed, and dissected by a panel of ex-players with the tactical insight of a goldfish.
  • Other top leagues have embraced VAR with far less hysteria. In the Bundesliga, fans accept that decisions take time. In Serie A, referees explain their calls over the stadium PA. The Premier League, by contrast, treats every check as a national referendum on the referee’s competence.
  • Even the most advanced technology fails. Semi-automated offside, introduced in 2024, still produces millimetre calls that feel unjust. If the machine cannot be perfect, why do we demand it of humans?

The ‘back to basics’ brigade are wrong

The popular counter-argument is simple: scrap VAR, return to the old days. Let referees make mistakes, but let the game flow. It is a seductive fantasy. But the old days were not a golden age. They were an age of unchecked bias, of home-crowd pressure, of referees who could be intimidated by Alex Ferguson’s watch. The reason VAR was introduced was not a whim. It was because clubs like Wolves and Brighton felt they were being denied justice by big-club bias. That bias did not disappear. It just moved to the VAR booth.

Going back would not restore the soul of football. It would restore a different kind of injustice—one that is quieter, but no less corrosive. The real solution is not fewer interventions. It is better communication. Rugby and cricket have shown that fans can accept decisions if they understand the reasoning. The Premier League’s refusal to mic up referees is not a technical limitation. It is a choice. And it is a cowardly one.

Verdict: The Premier League will mic up referees by 2027—or face fan revolt

The pressure is building. Broadcasters want it. Clubs want it. Even PGMOL chief Howard Webb has admitted that transparency is ‘the direction of travel’. The only resistance comes from the referees themselves, who fear the kind of abuse that already happens in grassroots football. But the abuse happens anyway. At least with microphones, we might hear the logic—or the lack of it. My prediction: by the start of the 2027-28 season, Premier League referees will be mic’d up for all VAR decisions. If they are not, the league will face a coordinated campaign from supporters’ groups to boycott televised matches. The technology is not the enemy. Our demand for perfection is. And that is a demand no human—or machine—can satisfy.

Filed under: Opinion | LA Premier League Home