Manchester City found guilty of all Premier League financial charges
An independent Commission has found Manchester City guilty of all charges relating to serious breaches of Premier League financial rules. The club artificially inflated revenues and concealed its true financial position between 2009/10 and 2017/18, and has confirmed it will appeal by Friday, October 2.
- Finding: Manchester City found guilty of all charges relating to serious breaches of Premier League financial rules
- Breaches: Charges cover "well over 100" breaches of Premier League regulations
- Period: The breaches occurred between 2009/10 and 2017/18
- Key finding: Sham contracts with commercial partners artificially inflated revenues and reduced costs by more than £900m
- Appeal deadline: Manchester City have until Friday, October 2 to appeal
- What's at stake: Sanctions will be addressed in a further hearing; the process remains ongoing
What was said
"The core decision establishes the facts of what happened at Manchester City during this period. It details how the club systematically broke Premier League Rules for nearly a decade."
"It also vindicates the Premier League's decision to pursue this case against Manchester City. While the process to date has been both long and difficult, the League has remained determined that the facts be established independently."
"It is a key responsibility of the Premier League to ensure that the Rules, approved by the clubs themselves, are upheld to protect the integrity of the competition. It is paramount that the League remains competitive and fair for all clubs and for the fans. We take that role extremely seriously."
"This disciplinary case, and this decision, are the most significant in Premier League history. There are elements of the case that remain to be decided, including, importantly, what sanction must follow for these breaches. Now we have the Commission's decision, we are committed to moving swiftly through the remainder of the process, to provide certainty for the League, our clubs and fans."
"Manchester City FC is both disappointed and surprised by the opinion of the Premier League Commission, that has been published today."
"The Club is innocent of the accusations made by the Premier League and a comprehensive body of irrefutable evidence exists in support of all of its positions, relating to this case. The Club will therefore be relentless, and where necessary proactive, in any and all appropriate regulatory and legal forums."
"The Premier League process remains ongoing, with significant elements uncompleted. Manchester City FC will now pursue the appeal avenues open to it, on the basis that the opinion contains clear material errors, of law, principle and fact, and is unsafe."
"The Club has diligently respected due process for eight years on the basis that the Premier League Board and Executive would behave as an independent, impartial and fair-minded regulator, free from partisan influence."
"The Club is obviously restricted in what it can say further until all future proceedings are complete."
Richard Masters framed the outcome as a vindication of the Premier League's decision to pursue the case, describing it as the most significant disciplinary case in the competition's history. His language — "systematically broke Premier League Rules for nearly a decade" — sets the tone for the sanction phase.
Manchester City's response is combative: the club claims innocence, points to what it calls a "comprehensive body of irrefutable evidence" and describes the opinion as containing "clear material errors, of law, principle and fact, and is unsafe". The word "unsafe" matters legally — it signals grounds for appeal beyond mere disagreement. City also stress they respected due process for eight years, a clear shot at the Premier League's conduct.
It is also worth noting the Premier League corrected City's statement for referring to a "Premier League Commission" when it is in fact an independent commission — a small but pointed intervention that underscores the regulator's sensitivity about process.
The numbers
- "Well over 100" breaches of Premier League regulations
- Revenues artificially inflated and costs reduced by more than £900m between 2009/10 and 2017/18
- The period spans 2009/10 to 2017/18 — nearly a decade
- Manchester City have until Friday, October 2 to appeal
Analysis: The commission's findings and what they mean for City
The commission's findings strike not only at City's accounting but at the integrity of the commercial revenue that underpinned their rise. According to the independent commission, Manchester City arranged "sham" contracts with several commercial partners, artificially inflating revenues and reducing costs by more than £900m. The club also filed accounts that concealed the true state of its finances from auditors and football regulators, and was significantly in breach of both Premier League and UEFA spending limits. During the Premier League's investigation, City failed to co-operate and did not act in good faith.
These are not marginal overspends. A figure exceeding £900m in artificially inflated revenue and reduced costs represents a structural distortion of the financial rules designed to keep competition fair. For rival clubs, the finding that accounts were filed in a way that concealed the true position from auditors is arguably the most serious aspect, because it goes to the reliability of the financial information on which the league depends.
The separate sanction hearing now becomes the central battleground. The Premier League says sanctions will be addressed in a further hearing with the independent commission, which will remain confidential until publication is permitted. The league has also made clear it intends to conclude the remainder of the process as quickly as possible. That language matters. Across English football, the uncertainty over what penalty follows these findings — points deduction, transfer restrictions or something more severe — will shape how clubs plan for future seasons. City's appeal, which must be lodged by Friday, October 2, will focus on what they call material errors of law, principle and fact.
Talking points
- If the commission found sham contracts and concealed accounts, is a fine alone sufficient — or must any sanction include a points deduction to protect the integrity of the competition?
- City say the opinion contains "clear material errors" and is "unsafe". Does that language indicate a genuine legal challenge or simply a holding position before the sanction hearing?
- The breaches ran from 2009/10 to 2017/18. Should the panel consider how City's success in that period affected rivals who played by the rules?
- Richard Masters called this the most significant disciplinary case in Premier League history. Does that raise the bar for the eventual sanction to match the severity of the findings?
What happens next
Manchester City have until Friday, October 2 to lodge their appeal. In parallel, the Premier League will proceed to a further hearing with the independent commission to determine the sanctions for these breaches, which will remain confidential until publication is permitted. The league has committed to moving swiftly. Until the sanction is known, the competitive and commercial landscape around the case remains unresolved.
Frequently asked questions
What was Manchester City found guilty of?
An independent commission found Manchester City guilty of all charges relating to serious breaches of Premier League financial rules, including arranging "sham" contracts that artificially inflated revenues and reduced costs by more than £900m.
When is Manchester City's appeal deadline?
Manchester City have confirmed they will appeal against the ruling and have until Friday, October 2 to do so.
What sanction will Manchester City face?
The Premier League says sanctions will be addressed separately in a further hearing with the independent commission, which will remain confidential until the publication of the outcome is permitted.
Related Articles
Filed under: Latest News | LA Premier League Home
