Man City Lodge Appeal After Guilty Verdict Over £830m Breaches
Manchester City have lodged a comprehensive appeal after an independent commission found them guilty of all charges related to serious breaches of Premier League financial rules. The commission found that between 2009/10 and 2017/18, City arranged "sham" contracts with commercial partners to artificially inflate revenues by £830m. The club says the opinion is unsafe and contains clear material errors.
- Verdict: Guilty of all charges related to serious breaches of Premier League financial rules
- Key finding: "Sham" contracts with commercial partners as part of a "disguised funding scheme" to artificially inflate revenues by £830m between 2009/10 and 2017/18
- Further breaches: Significantly breached both Premier League and UEFA spending limits; broke "well over 100" Premier League regulations
- Co-operation: Failed to co-operate and act in good faith towards the league during the investigation; three out of four alleged breaches upheld, one charge not proven
- Appeal: Lodged at 7pm on Thursday 1st October 2026
What was said
"Manchester City Football Club can confirm that at 7pm on Thursday 1st October 2026 the club lodged its comprehensive appeal against the opinion of the Premier League Commission, in relation to the Premier League disciplinary matter."
"The club's firm position is that, on multiple grounds, the opinion contains clear material errors, of law, principle and fact and is unsafe."
"The club is innocent of the accusations made by the Premier League and a comprehensive body of irrefutable evidence exists in support of all of its positions, relating to this case."
"We will continue to respect due process and are necessarily restricted in what we can say further until all proceedings are complete."
"Manchester City FC is both disappointed and surprised by the opinion of the Premier League commission, that has been published today."
"The club is innocent of the accusations made by the Premier League and a comprehensive body of irrefutable evidence exists in support of all of its positions, relating to this case. The club will therefore be relentless, and where necessary proactive, in any and all appropriate regulatory and legal forums."
"The Premier League process remains ongoing, with significant elements uncompleted. Manchester City FC will now pursue the appeal avenues open to it, on the basis that the opinion contains clear material errors, of law, principle and fact, and is unsafe."
"The club has diligently respected due process for eight years on the basis that the Premier League board and executive would behave as an independent, impartial and fair-minded regulator, free from partisan influence."
"The club is obviously restricted in what it can say further until all future proceedings are complete."
City's statements erroneously refer to a Premier League commission. It is an independent commission. The club has maintained innocence throughout, with chief executive Ferran Soriano calling the process a "Premier League conspiracy theory" in a video message to players and staff.
The tone of both statements is defiant. City frame the verdict as a product of a flawed process, and they have already escalated to appeal. The reference to "regulatory and legal forums" signals they are prepared to fight on multiple fronts. The club's insistence that "irrefutable evidence" exists suggests they believe the appeal can overturn the findings.
The numbers
- £830m: Amount by which revenues were artificially inflated through "sham" contracts
- 2009/10 to 2017/18: Period covering the breaches
- Well over 100: Premier League regulations broken
- 3 out of 4: Alleged breaches upheld; one charge not proven
Why the appeal matters more than the verdict
The independent commission's findings are damning: a nine-year scheme, £830m in inflated revenue, and a failure to co-operate. But the appeal is now the main event. City have not disputed the process lightly — they call the opinion "unsafe" and cite "material errors, of law, principle and fact". That language mirrors the kind of challenge that can succeed if the commission misapplied rules or ignored evidence. The fact that one charge was not proven gives City a foothold to argue the panel was inconsistent.
Crucially, City's chief executive **Ferran Soriano** has already framed the process as a "conspiracy theory". That is not a legal argument; it is a public-relations strategy aimed at undermining the commission's legitimacy. By appealing, City keep the case alive for months, perhaps years. The Premier League, meanwhile, must defend a verdict that took from September to December 2024 to hear and was described by the commission itself as "regrettable" in its delay. The reputational stakes for both sides are enormous.
On the pitch, the uncertainty could affect planning. But the source gives no indication of sporting sanctions yet. What is clear is that City will not accept the verdict quietly. The appeal is comprehensive, and the club says it has "irrefutable evidence". Whether that stands up is now the question.
Talking points
- City call the opinion "unsafe", but the commission found "well over 100" breaches. Can an appeal really overturn findings that broad, or is this about delaying sanctions?
- The club's statement refers to a "Premier League commission" when it is independent. Is that a careless error or a deliberate attempt to question the panel's neutrality?
- One charge was not proven. City will use that as proof of inconsistency, but does it undermine the rest of the verdict?
- Soriano's "conspiracy theory" comment was made to players and staff. Does that language help or hurt City's legal case?
What happens next
The appeal process now begins. City lodged it at 7pm on Thursday 1st October 2026, and the club says it will "pursue the appeal avenues open to it". The independent commission's verdict stands until the appeal is heard. City remain restricted in what they can say, and the Premier League has not yet commented on the appeal. The outcome will shape City's future and the credibility of the Premier League's financial rules.
Frequently asked questions
What were Manchester City found guilty of?
An independent commission found City guilty of all charges related to serious breaches of Premier League financial rules, including arranging "sham" contracts to artificially inflate revenues by £830m between 2009/10 and 2017/18.
When did Man City lodge their appeal?
Manchester City lodged their comprehensive appeal at 7pm on Thursday 1st October 2026, according to the club's statement on Friday.
What did Ferran Soriano call the process?
Manchester City chief executive Ferran Soriano called the process a "Premier League conspiracy theory" in a video message to players and staff.
Related Articles
Filed under: Latest News | LA Premier League Home
