Man City to argue sponsorship deals came from Abu Dhabi government
Manchester City will tell an appeal board that key sponsorship deals were funded by the Abu Dhabi government, rather than the club's owners, as they challenge a commission's finding that they breached Premier League financial rules between 2009-10 and 2017-18. The club must lodge its appeal by Friday.
- Appeal deadline: Friday
- Breaches found: All charges relating to Premier League financial regulations, 2009-10 to 2017-18
- Scale of disguised funding: £830.69m, according to the commission
- City's claim: Sponsorship money came from the Abu Dhabi government, not ADUG
- Commission's view: The explanation was "concocted well after the event"
- Etihad Airways: Considering legal action against the Premier League
What was said
"We concluded that it was an 'explanation' that the club had concocted well after the event in an attempt to obscure and conceal the realities of the disguised funding scheme."
"irrefutable evidence"
"damaging implications…despite the airline not being named in the redacted published findings"
"it categorically rejects any finding, conclusion or implication that suggests the airline has ever been involved in improper commercial arrangements".
The commission's conclusion directly challenges City's central defence. If the appeal board accepts the club's assertion that government money, not ADUG money, topped up sponsorship deals, City believe the regulatory breach falls away. The commission, however, has already dismissed that argument as an after-the-event invention.
Etihad Airways' intervention adds a separate legal front. The airline, City's principal sponsor, insists it has never been involved in improper commercial arrangements and is weighing action over the publication of findings that did not name it.
The numbers
- £830.69m: the scale of the alleged disguised funding scheme, as found by the commission
- 2009-10 to 2017-18: the seasons covered by the breaches
- Friday: the expected deadline for City to lodge their appeal
Why City's government-funding defence is a high-stakes gamble
City's appeal hinges on a distinction between ADUG and the Abu Dhabi government. ADUG is the private investment company of Sheikh Mansour, the UAE vice-president and deputy prime minister, and it took over the club in 2008. Mansour is a member of Abu Dhabi's ruling family and brother of UAE President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan. Premier League rules permit state-owned bodies to sponsor clubs, so if the money genuinely originated from government rather than ADUG, City will argue there was no disguised owner funding.
The commission rejected that reading. It found City artificially inflated revenue through "sham" sponsorship agreements with owner help, and described the government explanation as "concocted well after the event". Unless City can produce contemporaneous evidence that the funds came from government coffers, the appeal board is likely to treat the claim with the same scepticism.
Etihad Airways' potential legal action is a separate but complicating factor. The airline is owned by sovereign wealth fund L'Imad, chaired by the Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi, the UAE president's son. Etihad's public rejection of any improper arrangement puts it at odds with a commission finding that the club's principal sponsor was part of an inflated revenue scheme.
Talking points
- If City's government-funding argument is accepted, it could create a loophole for state-owned sponsors across the Premier League. Is that a risk the league can afford?
- Etihad's threat of legal action suggests the sponsor feels wronged by the commission's findings. Could that pressure the Premier League into a settlement?
- City chairman Khaldoon Al Mubarak claims "irrefutable evidence" exists. If so, why did the commission dismiss it as concocted?
- The appeal deadline is Friday. If City miss it, the commission's findings stand unchallenged. What does that mean for the club's future?
What happens next
Manchester City are expected to lodge their appeal by Friday. The appeal board will then consider whether to accept City's claim that sponsorship funds came from the Abu Dhabi government rather than ADUG. If the appeal fails, the commission's finding that City breached financial rules between 2009-10 and 2017-18 stands. Etihad Airways' separate legal threat against the Premier League could also escalate, with the airline seeking to clear its name.
Frequently asked questions
What is Manchester City's appeal deadline?
City have signalled an intent to lodge an appeal by Friday, after an independent commission found them guilty of all charges relating to Premier League financial regulations between 2009-10 and 2017-18.
What will Manchester City argue in their appeal?
They will claim that key sponsorship deals were funded by the Abu Dhabi government, rather than by the club's owners, Abu Dhabi United Group.
What does Etihad Airways say about the findings?
Etihad Airways says it "categorically rejects any finding, conclusion or implication that suggests the airline has ever been involved in improper commercial arrangements" and is considering legal action against the Premier League.
Related Articles
Filed under: Latest News | LA Premier League Home
