Financial Fair Play is a Lie Sold as Virtue

Everton were deducted ten points for breaching Premier League profit and sustainability rules. The charge: overspending by £19.5m over three years. The real crime: trying to compete with clubs whose revenues are baked into a system designed to keep them afloat. FFP is not about fiscal responsibility; it is about entrenching hierarchy.

How We Got Here: The Myth of Sustainability

The rules were introduced in 2013 to prevent clubs from spending beyond their means. But the means themselves are uneven. Manchester City’s commercial revenue — inflated by Abu Dhabi-linked sponsors — dwarfs Everton’s. Newcastle, since the Saudi takeover, face constant scrutiny over sponsorship fair value. Yet clubs like Tottenham Hotspur, whose owner ENIC has extracted dividends while the squad stagnates, face no sanctions. FFP punishes investment, not mismanagement.

Consider the numbers: Arsenal’s wage bill in 2022/23 was £235m; Everton’s was £175m. Arsenal finished second; Everton avoided relegation by six points. The gap in spending power is not a failure of Everton’s business model; it is a feature of a league where the top six earn 60% of broadcast and commercial income. FFP locks that disparity into regulation.

The Case for Rebellion: Why Ambition Is Not a Crime

Everton’s debt is largely from stadium construction — a fixed asset that increases long-term revenue. Their owner, Farhad Moshiri, has funded losses to keep the club afloat, not to line his pockets. Compare that to the Glazers, who loaded Manchester United with £725m of debt from their leveraged buyout. United pay £90m annually in interest and dividends. They have never breached FFP. The system rewards leverage but punishes direct investment.

  • Everton’s new Bramley-Moore Dock stadium will cost £760m — all privately funded. That investment should be celebrated, not penalised.
  • Aston Villa spent £270m on transfers over three years and were lauded for ambitious recruitment — yet they narrowly avoided FFP sanctions by selling academy graduates.
  • Leicester City won the Premier League in 2016 by spending beyond their natural revenue — then faced a points deduction in 2024 for the same strategy that brought them glory. Consistency is absent.

The Counter-Argument: Rules Exist for a Reason

Defenders of FFP argue that stopping clubs from spending beyond their means prevents bankruptcies. Portsmouth, Leeds United, and Rangers all collapsed under debt. But FFP does not prevent debt; it merely caps losses. Clubs can still borrow against future income (as United do) or use owner equity (as Chelsea did under Abramovich). The problem is not that Everton spent; it is that they did not generate enough revenue. But revenue generation is a function of success, and success requires investment. The rule creates a catch-22: to earn more, you must spend more; to spend more, you must earn more. Only clubs with existing commercial might — or state-backed sponsors — can escape this trap.

The Premier League argues that points deductions are proportionate. Yet the sanctions are arbitrary: Everton’s ten points for one breach; Manchester City’s 115 charges remain unpunished after four years. The league’s own investigation into City has been described as a ‘farce’ by legal experts. Until City is sanctioned — or cleared — the entire regulatory framework lacks credibility.

The Verdict: FFP Will Be Overthrown, But Not by Outlaws

By 2026, the Premier League will replace FFP with a new ‘anchoring’ system linked to a multiple of the lowest club’s revenue. This is a recognition that FFP is broken. But anchoring will still protect the elite: if the bottom club earns £100m, the top club can spend up to 5x that — £500m a year. The gap remains enormous.

My prediction: within two years, a club backed by a sovereign wealth fund — likely Newcastle — will challenge FFP in court under European competition law. They will win. And when they do, the entire edifice of ‘sustainability’ collapses, revealing that FFP was never about fairness. It was about protecting the status quo. The next decade of Premier League football will be shaped not by managers or players, but by lawyers in Brussels.

Filed under: Opinion | LA Premier League Home