Manchester City found guilty of Premier League financial rule breaches as club launches appeal
An independent commission has found Manchester City guilty on virtually every charge in one of English football's biggest financial regulation cases. The club breached Premier League financial rules between 2009 and 2018, mainly over sham commercial deals. City have until 2 October to appeal and say they will.
- Verdict: Manchester City found guilty on virtually every charge
- Breach period: 2009 to 2018
- Central finding: Sham commercial deals tied to sponsors
- Acquittal: One minor obstruction-related allegation
- Next stage: Separate hearing to determine punishment
- Appeal deadline: 2 October 2026
What was said
"Manchester City FC is both disappointed and surprised by the opinion of the Premier League Commission, that has been published today."
"The Club is innocent of the accusations made by the Premier League and a comprehensive body of irrefutable evidence exists in support of all of its positions, relating to this case. The Club will therefore be relentless, and where necessary proactive, in any and all appropriate regulatory and legal forums."
"The Premier League process remains ongoing, with significant elements uncompleted. Manchester City FC will now pursue the appeal avenues open to it, on the basis that the opinion contains clear material errors, of law, principle and fact, and is unsafe."
"The Club has diligently respected due process for eight years on the basis that the Premier League Board and Executive would behave as an independent, impartial and fair-minded regulator, free from partisan influence."
"The Club is obviously restricted in what it can say further until all future proceedings are complete."
City's statement is unusually combative for a regulatory matter. Rather than accept the commission's findings while pleading mitigation at the sanction stage, the club has attacked the verdict itself as "unsafe". That shifts the fight from the sanction hearing to the appeal process, where City will argue material errors of law, principle and fact.
The phrase "clearly restricted in what it can say" hints at a long legal road ahead. City are treating the commission's opinion as one step in a process that still has "significant elements uncompleted" — a signal they believe the appeal can overturn the liability finding, not merely soften the punishment.
The numbers
- Breach period: 2009 to 2018
- Charges: guilty on virtually every charge
- Acquittals: one minor obstruction-related allegation
- Appeal window: until 2 October 2026
- Years of due process cited by City: eight
Why the sanction hearing is the real battleground
The guilty verdict settles liability. The separate sanction hearing decides what happens next. Points deductions, fines and "other sporting penalties" are now firmly in play. For a club built on sustained on-pitch success, any points deduction carries immediate competitive consequences.
The commission's central finding on sham commercial deals is significant because it attacks the mechanism of funding, not just the accounting. According to the findings, the companies involved paid only part of the sponsorship fees, with the rest "effectively made up elsewhere". If that finding stands on appeal, the Premier League will argue the club gained a sporting advantage that must be reflected in the punishment.
The one acquittal — a minor obstruction-related allegation — is a narrow win for City, but it does not alter the overall picture. The commission backed the league's case on nearly every point. City's argument that the process was not independent or impartial is now their primary defence.
Talking points
- Is a points deduction the right sanction? Financial penalties alone may be dismissed as a cost of doing business by a club of City's wealth; sporting penalties bite where it matters.
- City's "unsafe verdict" claim. Attacking the commission's independence is a high-risk strategy that could sour relations with the Premier League for years.
- The eight-year wait. City say they respected due process for eight years; critics will ask why a case covering 2009-2018 took so long to reach a verdict.
- What happens to the 2026-27 season? If a points deduction is applied and then overturned on appeal, the integrity of the table could be compromised.
What happens next
The Premier League has confirmed a separate hearing to determine punishment. Manchester City have until 2 October 2026 to trigger their appeal rights. The sanction hearing and the appeal will together decide whether this becomes a historic punishment or a historic escape.
Frequently asked questions
What was Manchester City found guilty of?
An independent commission found City breached Premier League financial rules between 2009 and 2018, with the central finding focused on sham commercial deals tied to sponsors — disguised funding where only part of the sponsorship fees was paid by the companies involved.
When is Manchester City's appeal deadline?
Manchester City have until 2 October 2026 to trigger their appeal rights, and the club has already made clear it intends to do exactly that.
Will Manchester City get a points deduction?
No sanction has been decided yet. The Premier League has confirmed a separate hearing to determine punishment, where points deductions, fines and other sporting penalties will be part of the conversation.
Related Articles
Filed under: Latest News | LA Premier League Home
