Manchester United are not rebuilding — they are repeating the same mistakes with different players

For a club that claims to be undergoing a 'thoughtful rebuild', Manchester United’s summer transfer window is shaping up to be yet another expensive shopping spree dressed up as strategy. The shortlist reads like a FIFA Ultimate Team wishlist: Victor Osimhen, Aurelien Tchouameni, Jean-Philippe Mateta, Benjamin Sesko, and an unnamed Asian star. It is a scattergun approach that ignores the very lessons United should have learned from a decade of failure.

The Glazer-era hangover persists despite Ineos oversight

When Ineos took over football operations, the promise was of a data-driven, coherent recruitment model. Instead, United are repeating past errors. In 2013, they bought Marouane Fellaini in panic. In 2022, they signed Casemiro on a huge wage. Now they want Tchouameni for £60m — a player who has struggled for minutes at Real Madrid and would command massive wages. The same pattern: identify a player who was good two seasons ago at another big club, pay over the odds, and hope it works.

United’s attack is equally chaotic. Osimhen is a world-class striker, but his £65m release clause comes with a £300,000-a-week wage demand. Pairing him with Sesko — a raw talent who needs development — makes little sense when the squad lacks creativity. And Mateta? A solid Premier League striker, but not the transformative figure United need. The five-man shortlist suggests no clear first-choice, just a willingness to spend whatever it takes.

The academy pipeline has been abandoned for quick fixes

United’s youth setup once produced the Class of ’92. Now, the likes of Alejandro Garnacho and Kobbie Mainoo are rare bright spots, but the club’s transfer strategy actively blocks academy prospects. Instead of promoting from within, United are targeting established stars, blocking paths for players like Omari Forson or Dan Gore.

  • In 2023/24, United gave just 1,200 minutes to players aged 21 or under in the Premier League — less than half of Brighton’s total.
  • The club spent £400m since 2022 on players who were not first-team regulars at their previous clubs.
  • United have not developed a consistent Premier League starter from their academy since Marcus Rashford broke through in 2016.

Meanwhile, rivals are thriving. Manchester City sold Cole Palmer for £42.5m and used the funds to strengthen. United sell their academy players for pennies — or let them leave for free, like Angel Gomes. The result: a bloated squad full of expensive misfits and no identity.

Critics will argue that United need experience to compete — but they already tried that

There is a case for signing proven winners. Casemiro was supposed to bring leadership; he is now a fringe player. Raphael Varane? Injury-prone and retired. Cristiano Ronaldo? A PR disaster. The 'galactico' approach has failed repeatedly because it ignores the fundamental issue: United lack a playing style and a coherent recruitment philosophy. Buying superstars without a system is like putting a Formula 1 engine in a shopping trolley.

What United need is not more big names, but a clear identity. Brighton sign players under 23 who fit their system, develop them, and sell at a profit. Aston Villa built around a core of young English talent. United, by contrast, are pursuing Tchouameni and Osimhen — players who will demand the highest wages and offer no resale value. It is short-term thinking that will haunt them.

The real test will come in 12 months: if United finish outside the top four again, the strategy must change

By this time next year, United will have spent another £200m and will likely still be scrambling for Champions League football. The bank will demand results. If Ineos cannot deliver a coherent plan, they will be no better than the Glazers. My prediction: United will finish sixth in 2025/26, Erik ten Hag will be sacked by November, and the board will appoint another 'name' manager — starting the cycle all over again.

Filed under: Opinion | LA Premier League Home