Manchester United consider Eddie Howe as Carrick pressure mounts

Manchester United are weighing up a move for Eddie Howe if Michael Carrick fails to turn around the club's season, with Newcastle entitled to a compensation fee that has already halved to around £3m and expires before the end of the campaign.

  • Compensation: Started at £6m but has reduced by half; expires before the end of the season.
  • Key decision: Saturday's match against Chelsea is likely to have a bearing on Carrick's future.
  • Howe's record: Led Bournemouth to the Premier League in 2015 and won the EFL Cup with Newcastle in 2025.
  • Board split: Jason Wilcox favours Howe; Christopher Vivell prefers Julian Nagelsmann.
  • Final say: Omar Berrada assesses recommendations, with Sir Jim Ratcliffe and co-chairs Joel and Avram Glazer deciding.

What Howe could bring to Man Utd

Those who have worked alongside Howe describe a manager whose track record of improving players stems from a relentless approach on the training field. They also highlight his unwavering importance on setting a winning culture through methodology.

His body of work at Bournemouth and Newcastle is impressive. Appointed Bournemouth boss in January 2009 with the club facing relegation from League Two, Howe led them to the Premier League in 2015 and established the Cherries as a top-flight club before leaving for a second time in 2020.

At Newcastle, appointed in 2021, he took the club from relegation trouble to Champions League qualification on two occasions and won the EFL Cup in 2025 – the club's first trophy in 56 years.

The challenges facing Howe at Old Trafford

Managing Manchester United is an altogether different proposition. Howe's emergence as a potential successor to Carrick has been received with negativity in some circles, with sections of the fanbase vocal on social media that he isn't a big enough name.

Former United players Paul Scholes and Nicky Butt fell short of providing their backing to Howe on their podcast, though they spoke in favour of the 48-year-old's potential appointment when Ruben Amorim was sacked in January. Ex-captain Roy Keane is among those to have backed Howe, while Darren Bent, Gareth Barry and Jack Wilshere have also touted him for the job.

There has also been conjecture over how Howe would fit into United's footballing structure. At both Bournemouth and Newcastle, Howe developed a strong powerbase in all aspects of the football department, including recruitment.

Deal details

While the details of Howe's agreement with Newcastle when he left in the summer remain confidential, it is understood any club or national team would be required to pay a seven-figure compensation fee. Multiple sources have told BBC Sport that Newcastle reached an agreement over a compensation structure that decreases over time, starting at £6m but already reduced by half.

The compensation payments have an expiry date – understood to be before the end of the season – at which point he can be appointed for nothing. Paying a maximum of £3m for Howe may not be too problematic given the astronomical figures in the industry, though United's hierarchy may want to keep costs down given recent spending on hiring and firing managers.

Howe's recruitment record and structure fit

Howe's powerbase brought financial benefit to his employers. At Bournemouth, Nathan Ake, Callum Wilson and Tyrone Mings were all signed by Howe and sold for a big profit. At Newcastle, he was instrumental in the signings of Bruno Guimaraes, Anthony Gordon, Sandro Tonali and Alexander Isak – all sold for more than they joined for. Dan Burn, Lewis Hall and Tino Livramento developed into full England internationals under his coaching.

With a structure at Old Trafford including Berrada, Wilcox and Vivell, Howe would likely not be afforded the same level of autonomy immediately. However, he is on record saying he is happy to work alongside sporting directors, having done so at Bournemouth under Richard Hughes and chief executive Neill Blake, and at Newcastle with Dan Ashworth, Amanda Staveley and Mehrdad Ghodoussi.

What was said

"Howe is an obvious contender for the Manchester United job, just as he would be if the England head coach's position became available."

— BBC Sport's chief football news reporter, analysis

"Whether he is offered it or not will give a clear indication about the path United are going down."

— BBC Sport analysis

The analysis suggests the decision will reveal whether United's hierarchy is committed to a British coach with a track record of building clubs or pivots to a different profile. It also highlights that few managers get the chance to build a body of work over years at one club, as Sir Alex Ferguson did at Aberdeen before moving south in November 1986.

There is general disillusionment among matchgoing fans around football decisions since Ratcliffe bought his minority stake in early 2024, though Erik ten Hag, Ruben Amorim and Carrick have all been backed. Some say no manager can succeed with the structure as it is, and whoever is in charge must mould a squad bought by six permanent managers with differing playing styles.

Why Howe's compensation could make him the value option

Eddie Howe represents a rare opportunity: a proven Premier League manager available for a maximum of £3m, with that fee disappearing entirely before the season ends. For a club that has spent heavily on severance and new appointments, that financial logic is compelling. Jason Wilcox is thought to favour Howe, and the director of football's preference carries weight in the recommendation to Omar Berrada.

On the pitch, Howe's teams are known for high-intensity pressing and structured attacking play, but he would inherit a squad assembled by six permanent managers with conflicting styles. At Bournemouth and Newcastle, he built recruitment powerbases that generated profits; at Old Trafford, he would work within an existing structure. The challenge is whether he can adapt quickly enough to keep a disillusioned fanbase onside while delivering results.

The alternative, Julian Nagelsmann, is preferred by recruitment director Christopher Vivell, setting up a clear philosophical split in the boardroom. The final call rests with Sir Jim Ratcliffe and the Glazer co-chairs, meaning the decision will be as much about club direction as immediate results.

Talking points

  • Is Eddie Howe a big enough name for Manchester United, or does his record at Bournemouth and Newcastle deserve more respect from supporters?
  • Should United pay £3m now or wait until the compensation expires to appoint Howe for free, risking missing out on other targets?
  • Howe's strength is building powerbases, but United's structure limits autonomy – can he thrive under Berrada, Wilcox and Vivell?
  • With the squad assembled by six permanent managers, should the next boss be given time regardless of early results?

What happens next

Manchester United face Chelsea on Saturday, a match likely to have a bearing on how the club moves forward with Carrick. A poor result could accelerate a decision, with Howe's compensation expiring before the end of the season. The board must weigh Wilcox's preference for Howe against Vivell's for Nagelsmann, with Berrada, Ratcliffe and the Glazers having the final say. If Howe is appointed, he would need to unite a divided fanbase and a squad built by multiple managers.

Frequently asked questions

Is Eddie Howe a contender for the Manchester United job?

Yes, United are considering Howe as a potential successor to Michael Carrick if Carrick fails to stop the rot and loses his job.

How much compensation would Manchester United have to pay for Eddie Howe?

The fee started at £6m but has already reduced by half to around £3m, and it expires before the end of the season, at which point he can be appointed for nothing.

When will Manchester United decide on Michael Carrick's future?

Saturday's match against Chelsea is likely to have a bearing on how United move forward, but no specific decision date has been set.

Filed under: Manager News | LA Premier League Home