Everton’s midfield is not just bad — it is a tactical black hole devouring Sean Dyche’s entire project.

Strip away the talk of points deductions and takeover sagas, and you find a team whose central third has become a functional void. The Toffees are a team of disjointed parts: a defence that holds shape under siege, a forward line that can snatch a goal on transition, and a midfield that does nothing but give the ball away or retreat.

The historical comparison is not Burnley 2018 — it is Sunderland 2016.

The last time a Premier League team survived with such chronic midfield disorganisation was David Moyes’ Sunderland, whose central quartet of M’Vila, Cattermole, Kirchhoff and Larsson offered neither press resistance nor forward thrust. That side conceded 55 goals and stayed up by a single point. Everton under Dyche are on a similar trajectory: an expected goals against (xGA) of 1.8 per game since October, the worst of any side outside the bottom three, with midfield turnovers contributing directly to 40% of opposition chances. Compare that to Dyche’s Burnley sides that finished 7th and 10th, where the midfield duo of Cork and Westwood averaged a pass completion rate of 82% under pressure — Everton’s current pairing of Onana and Garner hovers at 71%.

The problem is not effort. It is structural. Everton’s midfielders are repeatedly caught in no-man’s land between pressing and covering, leaving a 15-yard gap between defence and attack that opposition runners exploit with relish. In the recent 2-0 defeat to Aston Villa, Youri Tielemans and John McGinn completed 12 passes into that zone — the exact area where Dwight McNeil and Abdoulaye Doucouré are supposed to operate. Instead, they watched.

The dyadic dysfunction: why Onana and Garner cannot coexist.

Sean Dyche’s preferred midfield pair is a tactical contradiction dressed in blue shirts:

  • Amadou Onana — a 6’5” destroyer who wins aerial duels but is caught ball-watching in transition, averaging just 2.1 recoveries per game in the attacking half, ranking 15th among Premier League midfielders in progressive passes. He is a Swiss Army knife who only has the blade for defence.
  • James Garner — a technically tidy but physically insipid distributor whose pass completion drops to 68% under pressure, and whose lack of pace means he is bypassed by any midfield runner. He is a metronome that cannot keep time.
  • Abdoulaye Doucouré — deployed as a No.10 but tasked with defensive duties he cannot execute; his 1.3 tackles per game are the lowest of any attacking midfielder in the league. He is a con artist wearing a false nine’s shirt.

The sum of these parts is a midfield that ranks 19th in the division for passes into the final third, 18th for shot-creating actions, and dead last for defensive duels won in the central third. Dyche has tried three different formations — 4-4-2, 4-1-4-1, 4-2-3-1 — and the results are identical: the opposition waltzes through the middle like a turnstile at Anfield on matchday.

The counter-argument: Dyche is a pragmatist who survives by any means necessary.

Supporters of the manager will point to Everton’s defensive record — 11th in goals conceded per game — and argue that low-block organisation is a legitimate strategy. They will note that the expected goal difference (xGD) per 90 is -0.45, not disastrous for a side in 16th place. They will invoke the scrappy wins over Crystal Palace and Nottingham Forest where the midfield ground out results. This argument is seductive but flawed: it mistakes survival for sustainability. The modern Premier League punishes teams that cannot keep the ball in central areas. Since the start of 2023, no side that finished in the bottom five after 20 games has survived with a midfield pass completion rate below 75% — and Everton are at 72.1%. Dyche is gambling that his defence can hold out, but the numbers suggest a collapse is coming. The home defeat to Fulham — a side that had lost four of its previous five — saw Everton concede three goals from midfield turnovers, all within a 15-minute spell where Onana and Garner lost the ball three times each.

The steel-man case is that Dyche has no better options; the squad is thin and the transfer market is closed. But that ignores the internal alternative: dropping Garner for a more defensive presence like Idrissa Gueye, or shifting McNeil centrally and playing a 4-3-3 with wing-backs. Dyche has the pieces to create a midfield that at least competes — he simply refuses to play them.

By March, Everton’s midfield will cost them six points in consecutive games, and Dyche will be forced into the 4-3-3 he has avoided all season.

Predicting relegation based on midfield metrics alone is a fool’s game — Burnley in 2019-20 had worse numbers and stayed up. But the context is different: the bottom three (Sheffield United, Burnley, Luton) all have midfields that, while limited, at least understand their roles. Everton’s midfield is a collection of confused individuals who do not know whether to press or sit. Against a run of fixtures that includes Aston Villa (away), Tottenham (home), and Brighton (away), the gap between defence and midfield will be exposed ruthlessly. The points will vanish. The inevitable tweak will come too late to prevent a nervous final day.

Filed under: Tactical Analysis | LA Premier League Home