Financial Fair Play is a tax on the poor, and the rich are exempt
The Premier League's profit and sustainability rules are not about fairness — they are a mechanism for the established elite to cement their dominance. Everton received a ten-point deduction for overspending by £19.5m over three years. Manchester City face 115 alleged breaches spanning a decade, yet remain untouched. The message is clear: challenge the hierarchy and you will be punished; belong to it and you are immune.
The precedent is damning
Everton's case is instructive. They built a new stadium at Bramley-Moore Dock, investing in infrastructure that will generate long-term revenue. Their overspend was, in large part, a bet on future growth — exactly the kind of investment the rules claim to encourage. Yet they were hammered. Contrast this with Manchester City, whose alleged breaches include hiding payments from sponsors and manipulating contracts. No points deduction. No transfer ban. Just a whispered investigation that never concludes.
Nottingham Forest face a similar fate for a £6m overspend. Meanwhile, Chelsea have spent over £1bn in two years, amortising contracts over eight years to stay within limits. The rules are a joke when creative accounting can circumvent them, but honest miscalculation brings ruin.
The argument: financial rules protect the status quo
- City's 115 charges: No resolution in sight. The Premier League lacks the stomach to punish its flagship club.
- Everton's ten points: A disproportionate penalty for a club fighting relegation, while City compete for titles untouched.
- Amortisation loophole: Chelsea's eight-year contracts are a clear exploitation of the rules, yet no action has been taken.
The system is not designed to prevent financial doping — it is designed to prevent upward mobility. Clubs that threaten the established order are battered into submission, while those at the top enjoy a presumption of innocence that never ends.
The counter-argument: rules must be enforced, and City will face justice
Defenders of the system argue that each case is judged on its merits, and City's complexity requires time. They point to the independent commission as a safeguard. But this is disingenuous. The Premier League's own rules allow for expedited hearings, yet City's case languishes. The longer it takes, the more it looks like a cover-up. If the charges were baseless, City would have fought them publicly. Instead, they rely on legal obstruction.
Moreover, the punishment for financial rule-breaking is inconsistent. Everton lost ten points for a relatively small breach. City escaped punishment for their FFP violations in 2014 with a £49m fine and a squad cost cap — a slap on the wrist. The message is that big clubs can buy their way out of trouble.
Prediction: within 18 months, Manchester City will face no points deduction
Expect City to escape with a fine — likely in the region of £20-30m — and a minor restriction on future spending. The 115 charges will be reduced through technicalities, and the Premier League will claim victory. Meanwhile, Everton will remain in the relegation zone, and Nottingham Forest will be deducted points. The rich will continue to buy impunity, and the rules will continue to punish the ambitious. It is the Premier League's darkest secret, and it is not going away.
Related Articles
Filed under: Opinion | LA Premier League Home