VAR Has Become the Premier League's Theatre of the Absurd

The Premier League's VAR experiment has mutated into a self-parody. Week after week, officials trade the spontaneous authority of the whistle for the frozen tyranny of the pixel. We are no longer watching football; we are watching a bureaucratic inquest with a ball.

The road to purgatory is paved with good intentions

When VAR arrived in 2019, it was sold as a cure for 'clear and obvious errors'. The pitch was simple: fewer scandals, more fairness. Five years on, the scandals are bigger, the fairness is contested, and the spectacle has been hollowed out. The technology did not eliminate controversy; it industrialised it.

Consider the 2023-24 season alone. Liverpool's disallowed goal at Tottenham, where Luis Díaz was wrongly flagged offside, was not a glitch but a systemic failure of communication. The PGMOL's subsequent apology was an admission that the process, not the technology, is broken. Then there was the farce at Newcastle, where a goal was awarded after three separate VAR checks, each more baffling than the last. These are not isolated incidents; they are symptoms of a governing body that has confused transparency with performance.

The argument: VAR has replaced authority with theatre

The core problem is philosophical. Referees were once the arbiters of the game, their decisions final and respected, even when wrong. VAR has turned them into middle managers, deferring to a remote control room and then performing a pantomime of consultation for the crowd. The result is a loss of moral authority that no amount of 'mic'd up' segments can restore.

  • The illusion of precision: Offside lines drawn to the millimetre suggest a scientific accuracy that does not exist. The frame rate of broadcast cameras cannot definitively capture the moment of contact, yet we pretend it can.
  • The erosion of flow: Matches are now punctuated by three-minute reviews that kill momentum and atmosphere. The average VAR check adds over a minute of stoppage time, but the psychological cost is incalculable.
  • The accountability vacuum: When a decision is wrong, the on-field referee is thrown under the bus while the VAR team remains anonymous. This is not justice; it is scapegoating.

The Premier League's insistence on using VAR for subjective calls—like the intensity of a challenge or the interpretation of handball—has compounded the absurdity. These are matters of judgment, not fact. By submitting them to video review, the league has created a culture where every decision is litigated, and no decision is accepted.

The counter-argument: without VAR, we would be worse off

The defence of VAR is familiar: without it, we would return to the dark ages of Frank Lampard's ghost goal and Thierry Henry's handball. Technology has corrected countless injustices, from offside traps to red-card offences. To abandon it would be to embrace ignorance.

But this is a false dichotomy. The choice is not between VAR and chaos, but between VAR as it is and VAR as it could be. The problem is not the tool but the hand that wields it. Other leagues—the Bundesliga, Serie A—have implemented VAR with greater subtlety, limiting its use to clear errors and trusting the on-field referee more. The Premier League's version is uniquely ham-fisted because it treats VAR as a tool for perfection rather than assistance.

Moreover, the argument that VAR has improved fairness is debatable. A study by ESPN in 2023 found that VAR had actually increased the number of contentious decisions, because it encouraged referees to second-guess themselves. The net effect is not justice but paralysis.

Verdict: the Premier League will double down, and it will backfire

My prediction is specific and falsifiable: before the end of the 2024-25 season, the Premier League will announce a 'root and branch' review of VAR, promising to 'learn lessons' and 'improve communication'. This will be followed by a minor tweak—perhaps a time limit on reviews or a change to the offside technology—which will be hailed as a breakthrough. It will not work. By May 2025, there will be at least three more high-profile VAR controversies that dominate the news cycle for days. The league will remain trapped in its own theatre, because the underlying issue—the refusal to accept that human error is part of the game—remains unaddressed. The only way out is to strip VAR back to its original purpose: correcting clear and obvious errors, not adjudicating the minutiae. Until then, we are all just extras in a show that has lost the plot.

Filed under: Opinion | LA Premier League Home