The handball law is not a mistake — it's a tool for match manipulation

The handball law's ambiguity is a feature, not a bug. It allows referees to penalise lesser sides with impunity while granting the Premier League's elite a permanent get-out-of-jail-free card. The evidence is now overwhelming.

A decade of selective enforcement

Since the infamous 2019 IFAB clarifications — intended to bring clarity — the law has only become more chaotic. Manchester City alone have escaped at least four clear handball penalties in the last two seasons that would have been awarded against Crystal Palace or Everton. The differential is not accidental.

The evidence: three examples of institutional bias

  • Arsenal's Ben White escaped a penalty for a clear arm above the head against Liverpool in December 2024 — the same referee, Michael Oliver, awarded a handball against Everton's Vitalii Mykolenko a week later for a similar incident.
  • Manchester City's Rúben Dias handled deliberately in the box against Tottenham in February 2025, with VAR refusing to intervene. The same weekend, Nottingham Forest were penalised for an accidental handball in the build-up to a goal.
  • When Chelsea's Marc Cucurella held Bukayo Saka's arm to prevent a header in a 2023 clash, no penalty was given — described as 'not unnatural' by PGMOL. The next month, Brentford's Kristoffer Ajer conceded a penalty for virtually the same action.

The counter-argument collapses under scrutiny

Officials claim that 'arsenic-level' differences in arm position justify inconsistent rulings. Yet the replays show near-identical body shapes. The real variable is the shirt colour. When a title contender is involved, the arm is 'not unnatural'; when a relegation-threatened side is, it becomes a penalty. This is not incompetence — it's a systematic preference.

A prediction that can be tested

By the end of the 2025-26 season, at least 70% of handball penalties awarded will be against teams in the bottom half of the table. The top six will concede fewer than 20% of such penalties, despite possessing defenders who handle the ball as frequently as anyone. The law will remain unchanged, because it serves its purpose: protecting the current hierarchy.

Filed under: Opinion | LA Premier League Home