Brentford’s Set-Piece Dependency Is a Tactical Time Bomb

Brentford are not a football team; they are a dead-ball machine. Their open-play numbers are so anaemic that you wonder whether Thomas Frank actually trains attacking patterns or simply instructs his players to win fouls and corners. This is not a criticism of their set-piece excellence — but of the structural rot that lies beneath.

The Numbers Don’t Lie (But They Do Mislead)

In the 2024/25 season, Brentford scored 15 goals from dead-ball situations — the highest in the Premier League. Their 11 set-piece goals in 2023/24 were similarly impressive. But the other side of the coin? They ranked 16th for open-play xG, 18th for shots from open play, and 19th for passes into the penalty area. This is not a sustainable model.

Compare them to their mid-table peers: Brighton, Crystal Palace, and even promoted Luton created more chances from open play. Those teams move the ball through the thirds; Brentford bypass the midfield entirely, looking to launch long throws or win free-kicks on the flanks. It works against naive defences, but against well-drilled units, the well runs dry.

A System Built on Sand

The core flaw is structural. Thomas Frank’s 3-5-2 (or 4-3-3) is designed to crowd the box and sustain pressure from crosses — but the build-up is too slow, too predictable. Opponents have learned to sit deep, concede throw-ins in safe areas, and then press aggressively as soon as the ball goes out of play.

  • Against Tottenham in March 2024, Brentford had 62% possession but only created 0.8 xG from open play. They lost 3-1.
  • Against Chelsea in April 2024, they managed 1.1 xG total, 0.4 from open play. They lost 2-0.
  • Against Manchester City in February 2024, they did not register a single open-play shot. They lost 3-0.

These matches expose the lie: when set pieces don’t come off — because the opposition defends them competently — Brentford have no Plan B. They cannot build through the lines; they cannot sustain attacks; they cannot create from central areas.

But What About the Counterarguments?

The rebuttal is simple: set pieces are goals, and goals win matches. Brentford’s defensive solidity (13th for xGA) and their ability to grind out results from dead balls proves they have a unique, effective identity. Moreover, teams like Stoke City under Tony Pulis survived and even thrived using similar methods. Why fix what isn’t broken?

This is a comforting narrative, but it ignores the trajectory. The Premier League is becoming faster, more technical, and more fluid. Teams that cannot manipulate space in open play are easily neutralised — just ask Stoke, who were relegated in 2018 after their set-piece edge dulled. Every summer, promoted clubs bring fresh tactics; every winter, opponents have scouting reports on every free-kick routine. The advantage erodes.

Brentford’s open-play structure is not just weak; it is regressing. In 2022/23, they created 1.2 open-play xG per game. In 2023/24, that dropped to 0.9. In 2024/25, it was 0.8. If this continues, they will be bottom of the league for open-play threat. That is not tactical genius; it is a cliff edge.

The Verdict: A Falsifiable Prediction

By the end of the 2025/26 season, Brentford will finish 15th or lower, and Thomas Frank will either be sacked or forced to hire an attacking coach to overhaul their open-play football. If they continue to rely on set pieces as their primary source of goals, they will be involved in a relegation battle within two seasons. And if you think set pieces can save them — ask Stoke whether the Premier League waits for anyone.

Filed under: Tactical Analysis | LA Premier League Home